Difference between revisions of "Irrelevant substantive response"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann,...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref> | Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref> | ||
The | The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response: | ||
-Tutor: It seems reasonable? | -Tutor: It seems reasonable? | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Category:Explainee_moves]] | <!-- [[Category:Explainee_moves]]--> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 27 September 2022
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.[1] The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response:
-Tutor: It seems reasonable? -Tutee: That the Earth is accelerating. -Tutor: Because of these masses. -Tutee: [tutee laughs] No. Those are some pretty big masses. ---> irrelevant substantive response
Notes
- ↑ Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341