Difference between revisions of "Irrelevant substantive response"

From INF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "Irrelevant substantive response" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading])
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref>
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref>
The example below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response:  
The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response:  


  -Tutor: It seems reasonable?
  -Tutor: It seems reasonable?
Line 9: Line 9:




[[Category:Explainee_moves]]
<!-- [[Category:Explainee_moves]]-->





Latest revision as of 09:14, 27 September 2022

Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.[1] The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response:

-Tutor: It seems reasonable?
-Tutee: That the Earth is accelerating.
-Tutor: Because of these masses.
-Tutee: [tutee laughs] No. Those are some pretty big masses. ---> irrelevant substantive response





Notes

  1. Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341