Difference between revisions of "Accept-part"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request <!--\parencite{karagjosova2005dialogue, stolcke2000dialogue}-->.<ref name="karagjosova2...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request | An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request <ref name="karagjosova2005dialogue">Karagjosova, E., & Tsovaltzi, D. (2005). Dialogue moves for DIALOG.</ref> <ref name="stolcke2000dialogue">Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., ... & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational linguistics, 26(3), 339-373.</ref> Implicitly, it rejects another part of the utterance, but we only code what is explicitly accepted. When an utterance does both explicitly, it should be segmented it into two units and labelled accordingly. | ||
Example (1)<ref name="stolcke2000dialogue"/>: | Example (1)<ref name="stolcke2000dialogue"/>: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Category:General_moves]] | [[Category:General_moves]] | ||
[[Category: Observed_in_Dialog_Moves_Domain]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:26, 27 October 2022
An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request [1] [2] Implicitly, it rejects another part of the utterance, but we only code what is explicitly accepted. When an utterance does both explicitly, it should be segmented it into two units and labelled accordingly.
Example (1)[2]: Something like that
Notes
- ↑ Karagjosova, E., & Tsovaltzi, D. (2005). Dialogue moves for DIALOG.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., ... & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational linguistics, 26(3), 339-373.