Difference between revisions of "Reasoning"
m (Protected "Reasoning" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 14:32, 2 March 2022
Abductive reasoning
"Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses." [1]
Analogical reasoning
"Analogical reasoning is a kind of reasoning that is based on finding a common relational system between two situations, exemplars, or domains. When such a common system can be found, then what is known about one situation can be used to infer new information about the other." [2]
Deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.[1]
Deep explanatory reasoning
The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.[3]
Inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.[1]
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019, May). Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).
- ↑ Gentner, D., & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical Reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Red), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition) (Second Edition, bll 130–136). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00022-7
- ↑ Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.