Difference between revisions of "Irrelevant substantive response"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Protected "Irrelevant substantive response" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref> | Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.<ref name="chi2008observing">Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341</ref> | ||
The | The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response: | ||
-Tutor: It seems reasonable? | -Tutor: It seems reasonable? | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 7 March 2022
Irrelevant responses are those that are not responsive to the Tutor’s comments but are nonetheless substantive.[1] The highlighted response below is an example of an irrelevant but substantive response:
-Tutor: It seems reasonable? -Tutee: That the Earth is accelerating. -Tutor: Because of these masses. -Tutee: [tutee laughs] No. Those are some pretty big masses. ---> irrelevant substantive response
Notes
- ↑ Chi, M. T., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science, 32(2), 301-341