Difference between revisions of "Accept-part"

From INF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request <!--\parencite{karagjosova2005dialogue, stolcke2000dialogue}-->.<ref name="karagjosova2...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request <!--\parencite{karagjosova2005dialogue, stolcke2000dialogue}-->.<ref name="karagjosova2005dialogue"/><ref name="stolcke2000dialogue"/> Implicitly, it rejects another part of the utterance, but we only code what is explicitly accepted. When an utterance does both explicitly, it should be segmented it into two units and labelled accordingly.
An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request <ref name="karagjosova2005dialogue">Karagjosova, E., & Tsovaltzi, D. (2005). Dialogue moves for DIALOG.</ref> <ref name="stolcke2000dialogue">Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., ... & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational linguistics, 26(3), 339-373.‏</ref> Implicitly, it rejects another part of the utterance, but we only code what is explicitly accepted. When an utterance does both explicitly, it should be segmented it into two units and labelled accordingly.


   Example (1)<ref name="stolcke2000dialogue"/>:
   Example (1)<ref name="stolcke2000dialogue"/>:

Revision as of 19:30, 3 March 2022

An utterance that accepts part of a proposal, request, statement or information request [1] [2] Implicitly, it rejects another part of the utterance, but we only code what is explicitly accepted. When an utterance does both explicitly, it should be segmented it into two units and labelled accordingly.

  Example (1)[2]:
      Something like that




Notes

  1. Karagjosova, E., & Tsovaltzi, D. (2005). Dialogue moves for DIALOG.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., ... & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational linguistics, 26(3), 339-373.‏